Hacking 2.0: The Ground Work

Hacking 2.0, The Ground Work

September 14, 2016

The Obama Administration, the Clinton campaign, the media and the DNC has spun a lie regarding the hack against the Democratic National Committee.  We have heard again and again how Russia was behind the email hack.  But there is no proof that Russia was indeed behind that hack.  

Statements even being made by the Administration that the general election could possibly be hacked.  Those statements have serious ramifications.  How can we trust the results of this election now?  If Trump wins, who's to say that the Administration or the FBI won’t tell us the Russians hacked the election?  And if Hillary wins and there was no hack, then how does the public know there wasn’t a hack?

We now know that the FBI cannot be trusted.  Director James Comey who has ties to the Clinton Foundation, has already given Clinton a pass on felony charges relating to the espionage act..  Attorney General Loretta Lynch secured her position by having a secretive and confidential meeting with Bill Clinton towards the end of the investigation.  No charges filed, combined with the fact that she has now been promised to stay on as AG if Clinton is elected, she can’t be trusted either.  

Whichever side you are on, Clinton or Trump, the results will be tainted.

The actions and words of Barack Obama points to his feelings about the outcome of this election.  He questions whether Hillary Clinton can beat Donald Trump.  Obama time and time again has demonized Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin.  He keeps talking about Trump’s admiration for Vladimir Putin.  Obama said, “I don’t go around saying that’s my role model.  Can you imagine Ronald Reagan idolizing someone like that?”

To answer your question Mr. President, Ronald Reagan would not idolize someone like that.  But to be honest, he wouldn’t cower against Putin like Obama has done and continues to do.  Under Reagan, Putin would never had rolled into Crimea, attacked the eastern borders of Ukraine or entered the war in Syria.  Ronald Reagan had a plan, he had a backbone and he had the resolve to put this country’s interest first.  There is a huge difference between the two men.  And if Ronald Reagan drew a red line, there would be no second red line.  He would follow through on his words, and Syria would have paid the price for using chemical weapons.

Donald Trump does not idolize Putin.  What Trump is doing is laying the groundwork with Putin, setting the stage so to speak.  And Putin is receiving Trumps message loud and clear.  Things will get serious with Putin fast.  In the intense world of international relations, there needs to be mutual respect between the leaders.  No one respects Obama.  

This is what former Secretary General Mikhail Gorbachev of the Soviet Union said this about his relationship with President Ronald Reagan.  “In terms of human qualities, he (Reagan) and I, how would you say, communicativeness and this helped us carry on normally.

“But when you talk about friendly relations in politics, it’s not the friendship of schoolmates.  

“I deem Ronald Reagan a great president, with whom the Soviet leadership was able to launch a very difficult but important dialogue.”

Donald Trump understands the respect necessary to deal with foreign leaders,international crisis, and economic issues similar to Ronald Reagan.  

Obama and Clinton, along with the media, continue to spread disinformation about the Russian hack.  Telling us that Russia is supporting Trump.  But the opposite is true.  Vladimir Putin supports Clinton.  It could be factually stated that to some degree, Putin owns Clinton.  Clinton hit the reset button with Russia.  But most importantly is the fact that Putin was involved with pay for play politics with Clinton.

The New York Times broke the story that Bill Clinton was paid $500,000 by a Russian investment bank who is closely aligned with the Kremlin.

This fact is important because the Russian investment bank was also closely aligned with a corporation called Uranium One which was founded by Canadians who are major donors to the Clinton Foundation.  These men put together Uranium One which had holdings in Canada and The United States.  Under Clinton’s direction while at State, Russia was able to acquire Uranium One and all of the deposits of ore.

The New York Times Reported, “Whether the donations played any role in the approval of the uranium deal is unknown.  But the episode underscores the special ethical challenges presented by the Clinton Foundation, headed by a former President who relied heavily on foreign cash to accumulate $250 million dollars in assets even as his wife helped steer American foreign policy as secretary of state, presiding over decisions with the potential to benefit the foundation’s donors.”

In next segment will we explore the truth about those behind the hack and what their actual motive is.  

In the words of Ronald Reagan, “I know in my heart that man is good.  That what is right will eventually triumph.   And there’s purpose and worth to each and every life.”