The Making Of A Conspiracy Part I

The Making Of A Conspiracy Part I

September 29, 2016

The definition of a conspiracy is a secret plan by a group, or the action of plotting.  In this series we will look at the real possibility of Clinton and a conspiracy cover up crimes related to her emails and email server.

The mainstream media and the White House have continued to sweep the scandals of Hillary Clinton under the rug.  With the help of Attorney General Loretta Lynch and FBI Director James Comey, Hillary Clinton was given a pass on her crimes against the nation under the espionage act.  The same laws that Edward Snowden and General David Petraues violated.

Snowden, still in exile in Russia and Petraues who plead guilty to a reduced charge of mishandling classified materials, a misdemeanor and he was fined $100,000.  Both men’s actions were violations of the espionage act.  They were criminal in nature.  Hillary Clinton violated that same act with her home brewed server.  

Director Comey said they found no evidence of intent to violate the law.  But the espionage act is clear on violations.  It has nothing to do with intent.  And NBC Nightly News, ABC World News Tonight, CNN, MSNBC, The Washington Post, The New York Times, The LA Times and the list goes on, all spun the American people away from the truth.  They were all complicit in helping Hillary Clinton get away with violating the espionage act.  It is paramount to treason.  

But let’s not get ahead of ourselves.  Let’s drill down and see if there is a conspiracy.  First we will define a conspiracy, then we will look at one the first things intelligence agents are taught to look for when building any criminal case, conspiracy or not.  Then let’s look at the law as it pertains to the espionage act and her actions.

The definition of a conspiracy is a secret plan by a group, or the action of plotting.  A conspiracy, under the law takes two or more individuals or groups.  Let’s examine Clinton and the actions surrounding her and determine if their is really a conspiracy.

If she is being upheld by a few people in power, the a conspiracy has taken place.  And to be clear about conspiracies, there are some important facts to remember.  If you ever have the opportunity to be trained at Quantico (FBI) or the Farm (CIA), a single point is driven home.  There are no coincidences.  Coincidences rarely occur and when reviewing any suspects or crimes, the first thing our highly trained intelligence communities look for are coincidences.

Coincidences are rarely just that.  They almost never exist.  Let’s look at the coincidences of the email case against Clinton.

Her first violation was Title 18 of the United States code section 793 of the espionage act, subsection (d).  Hillary copied classified documents that are the property of the US government and delivered those classified documents to her attorney.  

Her second violation was Title 18 of the United States code section 793 subsection (f)(1).  It deals with the handling of classified materials.  It states, in the most clear terms, “gross negligence.”  Not intent.

Her third violation was Title 18 of the United States code section 793 subsection (f)(2).  Again handling the classified information, “proper place of custody”.  The proper place of custody was on a secured government server.  Not a home brewed server.

Understand that continuing to list all of the violations that she committed under the act would be lengthy.  Most subsection of section 793 she violated at least once.  Then there is section 798 and section 1001 and section 1924.  Each of these sections she violated.  Instead of getting a careless chastisement, she should be facing decades in federal prison.

The first part of the conspiracy:

Clinton orders her servers to be wiped clean.  It was carried out by Bleachbit.  Most of the documents were unrecoverable.  However, Clinton made backups of all of her servers prior to the servers been scrubbed.  How do we know this?  She turned over all of the server documents to her attorney who had no security clearance.  Now, David Kendall has claimed that he has Top Secret clearance, but that is still being debated.    

In nearly every criminal enterprise records are always kept and complete backups stored in a safe place.  Could you imagine being blindsided by information you forgot about?  Again, the intelligence communities know this, but the FBI did not execute a warrant upon Clinton’s attorney to search the premise for backups that were not turned over to the FBI.  The question is why not?  Did David Kendall turn over all of the backup records Clinton provided him?  Or did he only turn over a portion of them?  Now we will never know the truth.

Director Comey and Attorney General Loretta Lynch understand the importance of classified material and the handling of classified material.  When they became aware of the location of the backed up server information, they failed to execute the charge of their office and uphold the Constitution.  

In an interview with Fox News, Edward MacMahnon Jr., national security attorney said, “In most situations like this you’d expect that a warrant would issued and the Marshals and the feds, FBI, somebody would go and get the thumb drive and take it somewhere where it would be considered safe by the government.”  But that was not the case.

The only group who pursued a search warrant was Judicial Watch.  The FBI and the AG’s office refused to have a warrant issued and executed.  What we do know, is that a gross dereliction of duty by Loretta Lynch and James Comey took place.  

In our next installment, we'll look at the second part of the Clinton email scandal and the coverup that has ensued.  We shall examine the media and the role of President Barack Obama.  There is a vital question that must be asked.  Does Obama have an actual stake in the outcome of the Clinton email controversy?