Hacking 2.0: Guccifer 2.0 Part Two
Hacking 2.0: Guccifer 2.0 Part Two
September 16, 2016
In this segment, Guccifer 2.0 talks candidly about which of all the candidates that he supports for president of The United States and what his political beliefs and motivations really are.
Q: Who do you support for president in America this year? Democrats and the mainstream media say that it’s you.
Guccifer 2.0: I don’t want to disappoint anyone, but none of the candidates has my sympathies. Each of them has skeletons in the closet and I think people have a right to know the truth about the politicians.
Q: What are your thoughts about each of the candidates?
Guccifer 2.0: As for me, I see great differences between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump. Hillary seems so much false to me, she got all her money from political activities and lobbying, she is a slave of moguls, she is bought and sold. She never had to work hard and never risked everything she had. Her words don’t meet her actions. And her collusion with the DNC turned the primaries into farce.
Guccifer 2.0: Opposite to her, Donald Trump has earned money himself. And at least he is sincere in what he says. His position is straight and clear. Anyway, that doesn’t mean I support him. I’m totally against his ideas about closing borders and deportation policies. It’s a nonsense, absolute bullshit.
We spoke with a senior intelligence analyst with the Central Intelligence Agency about the DNC hack. She is unable to go on record because of her position at the agency but this is what she said specifically about the hack.
“If the Russian government was behind the cyberattack against the Democratic National Committee, it’s highly unlikely that they would have released any of those documents to the press or any hacker site such as WikiLeaks. The Russian government does what is in the best interest of the Russians. There were no advantages for them to release those (DNC emails) documents.
“In stark contrast to the DNC email dump that we have seen, the Russians did hack the WADA (World Anti-Doping Agency) and they released those records. Vladimir Putin was personally insulted and humiliated when over a hundred Russian athletes were barred from competing at Rio. This kind of email release was retaliation by the Russians because of the Rio ban.
“In foreign intelligence gathering, a state sponsored cyberattack like the one at the DNC would have been held classified. It would have given the Russians an advantage into the inner workings of the party nomination process without anyone knowing that they were in possession of those documents. They wouldn’t have released them to help or hurt any candidate.”
About Guccifer 2.0 she said, “He is a young man who has some very good skills, or he was very lucky. This man is interested in being recognized as one of the top hackers in the world. It’s a matter of pride for him.
“If you look at the latest batch of information that he released, there really was nothing earth shattering in them. Julian Assange let the world know that he is about to release more emails soon. It’s doubtful that those emails have much to do with the DNC hack. If they were, Guccifer 2.0 wouldn’t have released what he did. He attempted to grab the spotlight.”
We asked her about Assange preparing to release more emails.
“There is a heightened sense of anxiety at CIA, NSA, and FBI. Typically, when he (Assange) makes an announcement of documents that are about to be released, they are typically significant and they are all surrounding Secretary Clinton. If there are emails that were destroyed from her personal server, lives could be at risk, as well as national security. We are all holding our breath.”
Whatever Assange has to release, one thing needs to remain in the forefront of every American’s mind, this is a criminal act. It’s an act of theft at the very least and potentially harmful to America.
One thing is certain, the media and the administration will continue to shove the lie that the Russians were behind the DNC hack. But the truth is far from that.
Hacking 2.0: Guccifer 2.0 Part Two
Reviewed by The Times of America
on
4:27 PM
Rating:
No comments