Hacking 2.0: Guccifer 2.0 Part One

Hacking 2.0:  Guccifer 2.0 Part One

September 14, 2016

The American people have been led to believe that the hack on the Democratic National Committee was perpetrated by the Russian State, all in an effort to help the Kremlin’s newest and best friend, Donald Trump.  But was it really the Russians, or was it someone else?  And, does the government actually believe that the Russians are behind this?  We set out to find the truth.

After WikiLeaks dumped the Democratic National Committee’s emails showing complete corruption at the DNC, ensuring that Hillary Rodham Clinton won the Democratic Nomination, Guccifer 2.0 released the following statement on Twitter:

GUCCIFER 2.0 Retweeted

GUCCIFER 2.0 ‏@GUCCIFER_2  Jul 22

GUCCIFER 2.0 Retweeted WikiLeaks

@wikileaks published #DNCHack docs I'd given them!!! #HillaryClinton #DonaldTrump #BernieSanders #Guccifer2

Guccifer 2.0 claimed responsibility for the hack.  If you believe the media and Obama and Clinton, it was Russian hackers working at the behest of Vladimir Putin.

But what the American people are not being told is who Guccifer 2.0 really is.  He is not the Russians, he does not work for the Russians and he is not Guccifer, the famous Romanian hacker.  Guccifer’s name is Marcel Lazăr Lehel.  Marcel is currently in prison and has been since 2014.  He is not responsible for the hack.  Instead it is an individual who idolizes what Marcel was able to accomplish and took his name to honor him.

This is what we know about Guccifer 2.0.  He has no ties to the Russian government or Russian hackers.  He is a freelance hacker.  And yes, he is a male.  His age ranges between 17 and 23 years and the entire reason he is doing this is for fame and power.  Guccifer 2.0 is most likely from either Hungary or Czechoslovakia.  The United States Government, the FBI, the NSA and the CIA all know these facts.  The Russian hacking groups that run state targeted cyber warfare for the Russians are known as Fancy Bear and Cozy Bear.  

The attack on the DNC originated in Eastern Europe and not from Russia.  The media and the administration have pushed hard to make the lie that it’s the Russians fact.  Consider The Washington Post's factually inaccurate story on the DNC hack.  This is some of the best conjecture surrounding the Guccifer, the Russians and American intelligence agencies information about the hack at the DNC.

The Washington Post reported, “two independent research firms have an assessment by the Democratic National Committee that its network was compromised by Russian government hackers.”

The Post continues to promote the Russian hacking story.  “Guccifer 2.0 claimed responsibility for the hack in an apparently attempt to deflect blame from the Russian government.”  The American people are now beginning to believe that the Russians are to blame.  The Post and several other media outlets are now picked up by many major networks, CNN, NBC News, ABC News and others citing these reports of complete disinformation to the American public.  Now stating that is was in fact the Russians all for the singular purpose of helping Donald Trump.

The Post now doubles down.  They report, “Analysts suspect but don’t have hard evidence that Guccifer 2.0 is, in fact, part of one of the Russian groups who attacked the DNC.”

Now that was a gutsy piece of information that they reported.  The fact is that no United States intelligence analyst gave that information to The Post, and the truth is that the intelligence community knows that the hack did not come from nor originate in Russia.  Furthermore they know that Guccifer 2.0 is not aligned with any foreign government and that he is acting on his own.  

Let’s hear from Guccifer himself and examine the facts.  The response are not misspelled or sloppy writing.  They are his direct responses, word verbatim.

Q:  A lot of people are concerned that Guccifer 2.0 has any links to special services and Russia?

Guccifer 2.0:  I’ll tell you everything I do I do at my own risk.  This is my personal project and I am proud of it.  Yes, I risk my life, but I know it’s worth it.  No one knew about me several weeks ago.  Nowadays the whole world is talking about me.  It’s really cool!

Q:  Can you prove that you are not Russian or another state sponsored hacker?

Guccifer 2.0:  How can I prove this is true?  I do not know.  It seems the guys from CrowdStrike and the DNC would say I am a Russian bear even if I were a Catholic Nun in fact.  At first I was annoyed and disappointed.  But now I realize they have nothing else to say.  There’s no other way to justify their incompetence and failure.  It’s much easier for them to accuse powerful foreign special services.

Guccifer 2.0:  (Angry)  They just f***ed up!  They can prove nothing!  All I hear is blah-blah-blah, unfounded theories and somebody’s estimates.

Q:  Analysts have stated that Russian hackers leave a specific embedded footprint.  They claim that they found the Russian foot print from Cozy Bear or even Fancy Bear.  What do you say to those reports?

Guccifer 2.0:  All most all famous hackers have been attributed to Russia.  The researchers supposed that the same instruments were implemented during the attacks.  But i’d like to reveal a little secret to all those cool IT-specialists out there:  all the hackers in the world use almost the same tools.  You can buy them or simply find on the web.  And by-the-way, it was the Russian company Kapersky Lab that was the first to start the myth about the almighty Russian hackers.  It’s a f***ing awesome advertisement.  The mean that only the Russian antivirus company is able to cope with Russian hackers!  Bingo!

Guccifer 2.0:  I just modified the (DNC) platform that I bought on the hacking forums for about $1.5k.

Q:  Are you afraid of being prosecuted by the FBI?

Guccifer 2.0:  No!  I’ve expected it and that’s why I am ready.  They certainly have great possibilities.  But it won’t be that easy to catch me.  I took all precautions.  Yes, there is still a risk.  But I hope they don’t find me.  

There is more of Guccifer and his candid responses.  Plus a United States intelligence analyst’s take on Guccifer’s statements, and what the government analysts actually believe.  One thing is certain, as we dig deeper into Obama, Clinton and the major media outlets, things become much clearer that they are controlling what the American people are being told and how they are being deceitfully manipulated.